I can see nothing beneath your heart...

Sometimes, something;
Sometimes, nothing...
INDICATION, perhaps?
...
Given to me, indeed...
Can tell you the story of my goods and deeds;
I can just tell,
but not swell;
that it is an indication.
...
I do not know;
if it is true,
or just a stupid clue...
My mind is muddy but,
My heart is heavy does it show...
I lose the track that loses me,
So here I go.
...
Maybe, I just dreming- building castles in the air...
NO!!! My heart says no...
It is not in maya version (computerized)...
It is not my thinking.
It is true.
...
Still, I don't get it.
What is hidden inside you...
I can see nothing beneath your heart.
...

YOU will not expect the person this blog is indicated to.

This song makes me remember of the wrongness I did,

It made me asked several people about some questions.

MAA, Sarah, thanks for your responds...

Comments

Buruj mudahkan pengenalan bintang di langit

Terdapat 88 sistem buruj di langit. Buruj sebenarnya adalah titik-titik bintang yang dikumpul dan dibahagikan serta diberikan nama-nama tertentu berdasarkan bentuk supaya mudah diingat. Ini merupakan cara sistem buruj mula terbentuk. Justeru, buruj ini sebenarnya bukanlah satu perkara yang benar. Ia sebenar adalah lambang khayalan ahli-ahli syair, petani dan juga astronomi lebih 6,000 tahun lalu. Tujuan sebenar penciptaan buruj ini adalah bagi membantu kita mengenal pasti jutaan bintang di langit. Semasa langit gelap, anda boleh melihat lebih kurang 1,000 hingga 1,500 bintang. Pasti sukar untuk kita mengenal pasti bintang yang mana satu. Malah sekali imbas, titik cahaya yang berkedipan di langit malam kelihatan sama sahaja. Oleh itu, beribu tahun dahulu, ahli astronomi awal telah membahagikan bintang mengikut kumpulan dan melukis gambar khayalan seperti kala jengking atau beruang, di sekeliling kumpulan bintang tersebut supaya mudah diingat. Bintang di dalam sesuatu buruj itu se

Can you IMAGINE IF Selena Gomez and Taylor Swift WEAR HIJAB?

Why Do Languages Die?

Urbanization, the state and the rise of nationalism. “The history of the world’s languages is largely a story of loss and decline. At around 8000 BC, linguists estimate that upwards of 20,000 languages may have been in existence. Today the number stands at 6,909 and is declining rapidly. By 2100, it is quite realistic to expect that half of these languages will be gone, their last speakers dead, their words perhaps recorded in a dusty archive somewhere, but more likely undocumented entirely. (…) The problem with globalization in the latter sense is that it is the result, not a cause, of language decline. (…) It is only when the state adopts a trade language as official and, in a fit of linguistic nationalism, foists it upon its citizens, that trade languages become “killer languages.” (…)

hafiez walks miles

Search This Blog